For some reason, I decided that I want to draw triangles in a browser… without Flash, the canvas tag, or Java applets. I also wanted it to be as fast as possible, so that rules out the obvious method of creating a thin DIV for every horizontal scanline of the triangle (too many DIVs). After 2 evenings of work, I present this proof of concept.

If you like it, please digg it!

This time, all browsers agree: null is an “object”, but not an instance of Object. What does it mean? The way I see it, you can not use null as an Object, so it should have no relation to Object at all. You cannot access or create properties on null, you cannot evaluate null.toString(), etc.

My solution in the $class library library is similar to what I’ve done for undefined. I created a dummy class called Null and put a special case in the $class.instanceOf and $class.getClass methods to consider the null value to be an instance of Null and nothing else.

Javascript is a very loosely-typed and dynamic language. Variables can be of any type, function parameters can be of any type, and properties of objects can be added and removed at runtime. This can be very useful in many situations, but it can also create some pretty nasty messes that are a nightmare to maintain. Sometimes more rigid structuring is needed.

There are several techniques and libraries available for creating object-oriented Javascript that support inheritance, but they usually involve some difficult-to-read syntax and fail to provide other object-oriented features like abstract methods and interfaces. My goal is to create a Javascript library that provides many of these features and eases the pain of developing complex javascript solutions. My first step towards that goal is the initial release of The $class Library (as of this posting, I’ve actually made one change since the initial version in response to the first comment).

The $class Library will be improving as I receive feedback. Check it out and tell me how it could be better (I already know the file could be smaller; I’ll work on that soon).

So is a RegExp a function or not? In the Firefox browser, typeof says yes. In all browsers, instanceof says no. Common sense says RegExp can be called like a function, so it should be considered an instance of both Function and RegExp (I would think RegExp should inherit Function). I plan on addressing this issue in my library (which still needs a catchy name so I can stop calling it “a javascript library for defining classes, creating inheritance relationships and testing inheritance relationships”).